Legal Opinion

Bank of Santa Fe v. Honey Boy Haven, Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1987No. 17069PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALTERS, Justice.

The Bank of Santa Fe and its assignee Fiesta Arabians filed a collection and foreclosure action against Honey Boy Haven, Inc. (Honey Boy) and Mr. and Mrs. Clifford Baltzley upon default in payment on two promissory notes. The Baltzleys cross-claimed against Honey Boy, and filed a third-party claim against John Rote, a shareholder and one-time Chairman of the Board of Honey Boy. Honey Boy filed cross-claims against the Baltzleys. The trial court entered a default judgment against Rote and granted the Bank’s motion for summary judgment against Honey Boy. The remaining…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Westgate Families v. County Clerk of the Inc. County of Los AlamosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. MorgansteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  4. Clay v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
  5. Samples v. RobinsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Albuquerque Concrete Coring Co. v. Pan Am World Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Brunacini v. KavanaghNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Bielicki v. Terminix International Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API