Legal Opinion

Herod v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 10, 1987No. 47, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

The issues here are whether the police violated the fourth amendment by a warrantless stop of petitioner’s van and search of its passenger compartment. We conclude that there was no violation because, as explained below, the police acted on probable cause so that the “automobile exception” to the warrant requirement applies.

Petitioner, John Herod (Herod), was tried on an agreed statement of facts in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and of possession of a handgun. He was sentenced as a recidivist to ten years…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re Tariq A-R-YCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Malcolm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Charity v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Agurs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Wynn v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API