Charity v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MOYLAN, Judge.
If there is a lesson to be learned from this case, it is that when the police are permitted a very broad but persistently controversial investigative prerogative, 1 they would be well advised, even when not literally required to do so, to exercise that prerogative with restraint and moderation, lest they lose it. In Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996), the Supreme Court extended law enforcement officers a sweeping prerogative, permitting them to exploit the investigative opportunities presented to them by observing traffic infractions even…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Morris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- State v. FunkhouserCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.