Legal Opinion

Charity v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 8, 2000No. 1949, Sept. Term, 1999PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

If there is a lesson to be learned from this case, it is that when the police are permitted a very broad but persistently controversial investigative prerogative, 1 they would be well advised, even when not literally required to do so, to exercise that prerogative with restraint and moderation, lest they lose it. In Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806, 116 S.Ct. 1769, 135 L.Ed.2d 89 (1996), the Supreme Court extended law enforcement officers a sweeping prerogative, permitting them to exploit the investigative opportunities presented to them by observing traffic infractions even…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Morris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. State v. FunkhouserCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API