Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel Scott Gahagan (87-1991), Michael John Gahagan (87-1993), Susan Soper (87-1992)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 3, 1989No. 87-1991 to 87-1993PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOWD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
Defendants-appellants Daniel Gahagan and Michael Gahagan appeal from the judgment of the district court entered pursuant to Rule 11(a)(2) plea agreements with the government wherein the Gahagans pleaded guilty to the charge of possessing with intent to distribute approximately 311 grams of hashish. Defendant-appellant Susan Soper appeals from the judgment of the district court entered pursuant to a Rule 11(a)(2) plea of guilty to a superseding information in which she was charged with conspiracy to possess marijuana. Simply stated, this appeal raises…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Maryland v. GarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Richard J. Leary, and F.L. Kleinberg & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Leigh Raymond TamuraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Ignatius G. ANG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Mary Velardi and Frances Velardi v. Cornelius R. Walsh, Jr. And Robert L. BoekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- State v. KleypasSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
- United States v. Kenneth KingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- State v. CastagnolaOhio Supreme Court · 2015
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.