Legal Opinion

Abramson v. Wolf

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 27, 1934No. 31,461PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to recover on a note.

The facts shown by the evidence are summarized as follows: In *857March, 1927, plaintiff loaned Dora Wolf, wife of the defendant, the sum of $1,500, taking her note therefor. Later Mrs. Wolf desired to borrow for the use of her husband the further sum of $1,000. The plaintiff agreed to loan the defendant the $1,000 on condition a new note be made for $2,500, to be signed by Mrs. Wolf and her husband, defendant here, and this was done, the note being made about June 1, 1927. Payments were made on this note…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lambert v. RheaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Stewart v. Marland Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  3. Geppelt v. Middle West Stone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Nichols v. WeaverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  5. Skaer v. American National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sams v. Commercial Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Gelphman v. GelphmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  3. Secretary of Kansas Dept. of Transportation v. Underwood Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. Reinsch v. Cities Service Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Matthews v. Montgomery, Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API