Legal Opinion

Bodley v. Taylor

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 14, 1809PublishedCited by 36 opinions

ERROR to the district court of the United States, for the district of Kentucky, in a suit in chancery. Thomas Bodley, James Hughes, Robert Poague and Robert Campbell, citizens of Kentucky, brought their bill in chancery against John Taylor, a citizen of Virginia, in the state court for the district of Washington, from whence it was afterwards, by consent, removed into the federal court for the district of. Kentucky.

Read the full summary

ERROR to the district court of the United States, for the district of Kentucky, in a suit in chancery. Thomas Bodley, James Hughes, Robert Poague and Robert Campbell, citizens of Kentucky, brought their bill in chancery against John Taylor, a citizen of Virginia, in the state court for the district of Washington, from whence it was afterwards, by consent, removed into the federal court for the district of. Kentucky. The bill states that on the 17th of October, 1783, Henry Crutcher and John Tibbs made the following entry with, the county surveyor, viz. “ Henry Crutcher and John i ibbs enter,?…

1Opinion of the Court

inarch 14th, 1809.

Marshall, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the court as follows:

This js an appeal from a decree of the court for the district of Kentucky, by which Taylor was directed to convey, to Bodley and others a part of a tract of land to which he held an elder patent,. but to-which Bodley and others claim the better right under a junior patent. The judge of the district court having directed such part of the land held by Taylor to be conveyed to Bodley and others, as appeared by certain rules, which he has applied to the case, to be within their claim, and not within Taylor’s location,…

2Cited by36 opinions

  1. Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
  2. Brown v. BuckMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Walden v. BodleySupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  4. The People of N.C. Ex Rel . Van Bokkelen v. . CanadaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  5. Burtis Ringo v. Charles BinnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1836

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API