Legal Opinion

Godwin v. . Kennedy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1928Published

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: We think the trial court erred in limiting the use of the chemical analysis, made by the State Chemist, to evidence tending to show want of consideration. Fertilizer Co. v. Thomas, 181 N. C., 274, 106 S. E., 835. True, it is provided by C. S., 4697, that “no suit for damages from results of use of fertilizer may be brought except after chemical analysis showing deficiency of ingredients” (unless other facts appear, not now pertinent), and when such analysis is had in accordance with the provisions of the statute, the certificate of the State Chemist,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. French.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Swift Co. v. . AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Swift & Co. v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Sewing Machine Co. v. . BurgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Phipps v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API