Legal Opinion

Olson v. H & B PROPERTIES, INC.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1994No. 21316PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROST, Justice.

Plaintiff-Appellee Olson filed a declaratory action against Defendanb-Appellant H & B Properties, Inc. (“H & B”) seeking an equitable reallocation of irrigation ditch usage rights in the Mimbres Valley Swarts Community Ditch Irrigation System, also known as the Swarts West Side Ditch (“Swarts ditch”). The district court granted summary judgment for Olson and eliminated three days of H & B’s ditch usage. Based upon the cessation of purpose doctrine of the law of easements, we affirm.

FACTS

Olson and H & B own adjacent real property in Grant County, New Mexico. Both own…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kearney & Son v. FancherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Snow v. AbalosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Murphy v. KerrDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1923
  4. Posey v. DoveNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Kennedy v. BondNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wilson v. DenverNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  2. City of Rio Rancho v. AMREP SOUTHWEST INC.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Skeen v. BoylesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Walker v. United StatesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Sitterly v. MatthewsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API