Legal Opinion
Hartsock v. Commodity Credit Corp.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided May 28, 1950No. Civ. No. 1-9PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWITZER, District Judge.
Builders Distributing Corporation, an Ohio Corporation, defendant herein, having filed what is designated “Special Appearance and Motion to Dismiss,” the question for determination is whether or not that corporation has been brought within the jurisdiction of this court in. this proceeding.
From the complaint of plaintiff Hart-sock it is shown:
That in the fall of 1949, defendant, Commodity Credit Corporation, an agency operating within the United States Department of Agriculture, undertook to procure the construction of a large number of grain storage bins in Iowa for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mississippi Publishing Corp. v. MurphreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Read v. RouschSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Atwood v. Sault Ste. Marie Light, Heat & Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Benton v. Morningside CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kenny v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Budget Marketing, Inc. v. TobackDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1981