Legal Opinion · Dissent

Perrico Property Systems v. City of Independence

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 1994No. 65142Published

1DissentPatton, Presiding Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s disposition of appellant’s assignments of error. I would find that the appellant did not adequately demonstrate the existence of genuine issues of material fact concerning the zoning of appellant’s property. Consequently, I would affirm the decision of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of appellee.

Subsequent to initiating a declaratory judgment action to determine the validity of a zoning ordinance as pertaining to a certain piece of property, a party usually must exhaust administrative remedies. Driscoll v. Austintown Assoc. (1975),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Driscoll v. Austintown AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Mintz v. Village of Pepper PikeOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API