Legal Opinion

Lester v. Board of Elections for District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 20, 1970No. Civ. A. 3130-70PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CORCORAN, District Judge.

I

The Election Law of the District of Columbia requires that a person have “resided in the District continuously since the beginning of the one-year period ending on the day of such election” in order to participate in all aspects of the electoral process. 1 D.C.Code § 1102 (2) (a) (1967 ed., as amended by Pub.L.No. 91-405, Sept. 22, 1970).

The plaintiffs have brought this suit as a class action 1 on behalf of themselves and “all other persons who reside or are domiciled in the District of Columbia and who satisfy all requirements for registration as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Carrington v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bolanowski v. RaichDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1971
  3. Beare v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
  4. Gordon v. EXECUTIVE COM. OF DEM. P. OF CITY OF CHARLESTONDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
  5. Raza Unida Party v. BullockDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API