Legal Opinion

Raza Unida Party v. Bullock

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided September 15, 1972No. SA-72-CA-158, MO-72-CA-50, W-72-CA-37 and CA-72-H-990PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SUTTLE, District Judge.

The various plaintiffs, comprised of minor political parties, their candidates for public office, qualified voters wishing to vote for candidates of these political parties, and individuals desiring to run for public office as independent candidates, bring class actions seeking to have. this Court declare invalid certain provisions of the Texas Election Code, 1 and related Texas election laws. They also seek to enjoin the Texas Secretary of State from enforcing the challenged enactments. ‘íphe statutes involved are all statewide in their application,…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. American Party of Texas v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Tripp v. ScholzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  3. Wurtzel v. FalceySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  4. Communist Party v. AustinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1974
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API