Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Neal

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided July 3, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00515Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION JAMES BURNETT, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:24-CV-515-GSL-JEM RON NEAL, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER James Burnett, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint.1 ECF 2. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the court must review the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API