O'Brien v. Calmar S. S. Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIDDLE, Circuit Judge.. The plaintiff, a seaman, was injured on a pier while adjusting a gang plank to connect with the defendant’s vessel lying at the pier. He brought suit under Section 33 of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (the Jones Act), 46 U.S.C.A. § 688. The trial judge dismissed the action, entered judgment for the defendant, and refused a new trial, on the ground that no negligence was shown.
The Jones Act provides that a seaman may recover for personal injuries suffered “in the course of his employment * * * with the right of trial by jury.” The act has been construed not to extend…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Bailey v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Todahl v. Sudden & ChristensonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Hughes v. Alaska S. S. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
- Esteves v. Lykes Bros. S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oliver v. Calmar S. S. CoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Flynn v. Reading Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
- Serbokov v. Great Lakes Transit Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1941
- Williams v. Glens Falls Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1941