Legal Opinion
Todahl v. Sudden & Christenson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 20, 1925No. 4439PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was a seaman in the service of the steamship Edna, a vessel which belonged to the defendants in error. He brought an action against the owners of the Edna and the McCormick Steamship Company, which was using the vessel under “contract or charter” from the owners, to recover for injuries sustained on a wharf alongside of which the vessel was moored." Two causes of action were set forth in the complaint. The first was to recover damages under section 33 of the Merchant Marine Act of June 5, 1920, 41 Stat. 1007 (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 8337a),…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Grant Smith-Porter Ship Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Kennedy v. ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Gebhard v. S.S. Hawaiian LegislatorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Wheeler v. West India S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Paul v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Dangovich v. Isthmian Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.