Legal Opinion

Kirch v. Nicholson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1931No. 1648PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Chief Justice.

The transaction that caused the prosecution of this action was before the court in Davison, et al. v. Nicholson, 37 Wyo. 412, 263 Pac. 605. Davison and Mitchell, plaintiffs in the former action; Kirch, plaintiff in this action, and Nicholson, defendant in both actions, were stockholders of the Riverton Elevator Company. J. A. Linderholm had obtained two judgments against the elevator company, and in 1923 executions were issued. Pursuant to Section 5943, et seq., Wyo. C. S. 1920, Davison, Mitchell and Kirch became bail for the payment of the judgments for the purpose of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ParkerWyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Becker v. HopperWyoming Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Gilland v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1896
  4. M'Mahon v. AllenNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1855
  5. Davison v. NicholsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peters Grazing Association v. LegerskiWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Pangarova v. NicholsWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Security-First Nat. Bank v. KingWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Graham and Hill v. Davis Oil CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Spriggs v. GoodrichWyoming Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API