Legal Opinion

Gilland v. Union Pacific Railway Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

ERROR to the District Court for the County of Laramie, Hon. Richard H. Scott, judge. Action by George H. Gilland to recover damages from the Union Pacific Railway Company, for the negligent destruction of grass by fire. The material facts are stated in the opinion. There was no joint ownership with the plaintiff in the grass destroyed or any portion thereof. That much is established by the evidence.

Read the full summary

ERROR to the District Court for the County of Laramie, Hon. Richard H. Scott, judge. Action by George H. Gilland to recover damages from the Union Pacific Railway Company, for the negligent destruction of grass by fire. The material facts are stated in the opinion. There was no joint ownership with the plaintiff in the grass destroyed or any portion thereof. That much is established by the evidence. A joint tenancy has a fourfold unity, namely, a unity of title, of interest, of time, and of possession, the interest being acquired by all, and by the same act or conveyance, commencing at the…

1Opinion of the Court

PottbR, Justice.

George H. Gilland brought this action against the Union Pacific Railway Company to recover damages for negligently permitting "fires upon its right of way to spread into and upon certain lands alleged to be in the possession of the plaintiff, which fires consumed and destroyed plaintiff’s, grass growing on said lands; said injury is alleged to have occurred about the 20th day of October, 1891.' The damages were placed in the petition at the sum of five hundred dollars.

The answer of the defendant admitted that it was a corporation, and denied generally each other allegation of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CusenberryTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Van Hoozier v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. Greenwood v. PierceTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of ChamberlainNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Brown v. WellingtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Henderson v. ColemanWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bamforth v. IhmsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Becker v. HopperWyoming Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Gustin v. HartingWyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Becker v. HopperWyoming Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API