Legal Opinion
Daniel Johnson v. Bert Bell/Pete
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 21, 2006No. 06-1517Published
1Opinion of the Court
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 06-1517 ___________ Daniel Johnson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL * Player Retirement Plan, * * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: September 28, 2006 Filed: November 21, 2006 ___________ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Daniel Johnson appeals from the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Retirement Plan (Plan) in his action…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ronnie Layes v. Mead Corporation Cna Insurance Company Mead Retirement Plan Mead Benefit ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Herbert Ferrari, M.D. v. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Brenda Fletcher-Merrit v. Noram Energy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- David Tillery and Kathy Tillery v. Hoffman Enclosures, Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Spencer Norris, Personal Representative of the Estate of Sue Pollock v. Citibank, N.A. Disability Plan (501), Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.