Legal Opinion

Finkel v. Otto Misch Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1939No. Docket No. 80, Calendar No. 40,767PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff brought action in assumpsit against defendants Otto Misch Company and Samuel Plotkin for $79,000 for his services as an architect. He claims that he designed two buildings for Samuel Plotkin, to be erected at an estimated cost of $560,000, and another for Plotkin and Otto Misch Company to cost $1,700,000. Plaintiff’s claim against Plotkin was based upon a written contract and his claim against Otto Misch Company and Plot-kin was based on a joint oral contract. No claim was made against the Otto Misch Company with respect to the two buildings designed for Plotkin. At the close of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crook v. EckhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Hopkins v. BishopMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Fitzcharles v. MayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Jenks v. County of InghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Niemi v. BradyMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zaitzeff v. RaschkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Bathke v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Max v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Routt v. BerridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. People v. PannellMichigan Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API