Finkel v. Otto Misch Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
Plaintiff brought action in assumpsit against defendants Otto Misch Company and Samuel Plotkin for $79,000 for his services as an architect. He claims that he designed two buildings for Samuel Plotkin, to be erected at an estimated cost of $560,000, and another for Plotkin and Otto Misch Company to cost $1,700,000. Plaintiff’s claim against Plotkin was based upon a written contract and his claim against Otto Misch Company and Plot-kin was based on a joint oral contract. No claim was made against the Otto Misch Company with respect to the two buildings designed for Plotkin. At the close of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Crook v. EckhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Hopkins v. BishopMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Fitzcharles v. MayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Jenks v. County of InghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Niemi v. BradyMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by6 opinions
- Zaitzeff v. RaschkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Bathke v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Max v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Routt v. BerridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. PannellMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.