Hopkins v. Bishop
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Adsit, J). Eeplevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, C. J.
The defendant, as sheriff of Kent county, represents in this litigation attaching creditors of Clinton H. Hopkins, a son of the plaintiff. The *330plaintiff brought replevin for the goods attached, and recovered judgment in the Kent county circuit court.
It was shown by the plaintiff on the trial that his son, who was in the mercantile business at Oedar Springs, was. unable to meet his obligations; and that plaintiff was signer of two notes, with his son, to one McBryer, for the means with which to engage in business. These notes were for $1,000 and $800, and there was due upon them, December 15,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Trudo v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Butler v. StoddardNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
- Doyle v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
- Clark v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bell v. NilesSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
- Zaitzeff v. RaschkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Wiegand v. Lincoln Traction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1932
- Parfet v. Kansas City Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Sampeer v. BoschmaMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.