United States v. Lawrence C. Fraction
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FULLAM, District Judge.
The government appeals from an Order of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, 613 F.Supp. 295, suppressing a confession as involuntary. The district court ruled that the confession had been improperly induced by promises.
We accept as correct the findings of historical fact made by the district judge. They may be summarized as follows:
On September 2, 1984, an FBI agent named White traveled to the Rahway State Prison in New Jersey in order to question the defendant, Lawrence Fraction, about a 1983 robbery of a bank in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hutto v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Pugliese v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- United States of America, and Cross-Appellant v. Randolph Short, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Cruz, Jose, United States of America v. Alverio, Julian MiguelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- United States v. Calisto, Samuel J.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.