Legal Opinion
United States v. Calisto, Samuel J.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 29, 1988No. 87-1096PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
STAPLETON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, Samuel Calisto, was charged with possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1982), and with receipt and possession of firearms after having been convicted of a felony, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(h)(1) and 1202(a)(1) (Appendix) (1982 & 1987 Supp.). He was convicted on all three counts at a bench trial. Calisto’s convictions rest on physical evidence seized during a search of his home pursuant to a warrant and on one of two incriminating statements he made during that search. Calisto…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Sherwood v. MulvihillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Hart v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Rufus Brown, Rodney Franklin, Ama Baltimore, Rufus Brown, in 92-3491, Ama Baltimore, in 92-3562Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Jean M. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Craig William BrownleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.