Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Engeweiler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 12, 1992No. 9002-80469; CA A66013Published

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Child appeals from an order of the juvenile court remanding him to adult court. He claims that the juvenile court did not have authority to order psychological evaluations in preparation for the remand hearing and that there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s finding that it was in child’s best interests and in the best interests of society to remand him. We review de novo, State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Slack, 17 Or App 57, 520 P2d 905, rev den (1974), and affirm.

On February 22, 1990, child was arrested and charged with rape, sodomy and murder. The next day, the state filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department of Washington County v. SlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  2. State v. ZaunerOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State Ex Rel. Segrest v. Van HoomissenOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API