Legal Opinion

State v. Zauner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1968No. 12265PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

Peter Zauner was either 16 or 17 years of age at the time of the proceedings which are the subject of this appeal. A petition was filed in Juvenile Court alleging that he was within the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court because he had killed a girl while attempting to commit rape. A hearing was held and his ease was remanded to an adult court for trial. Zauner appeals from the juvenile proceedings upon the sole ground that the order of remand is erroneous.

The order of remand recites:

“3. If in fact the above-named child committed the offense charged in the petition: [and then sets out the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. DunsterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. Hadlock v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  3. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. Hadlock v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  5. Zauner v. CuppDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API