Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Segrest v. Van Hoomissen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1976PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus. Plaintiff (relator) Segrest is the administrator of the Children’s Services Division (the "Division”). The alternative writ alleged that the defendant presided in two cases involving two juvenile children and entered an order "to conduct an examination and evaluation of both parents, of the stepfather and of the minor child in the ["W”] proceedings” and of the father of the minor child in the "S” proceeding. The defendant further ordered that the doctor’s fee for the psychiatric evaluations be paid by the Division.

Plaintiff (the "Division”) moved to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. STATE OF OREGON EX REL. SEGREST v. BradshawOregon Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. G. L.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. Dept. of Human Services v. W. C. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. L. J. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. MaginnisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. FoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API