Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Harsh v. Sheets

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2012No. 2012-0093PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Robert Harsh, for a writ of habeas corpus. Harsh previously unsuccessfully raised many of his same claims in his direct appeal, State v. Harsh, Butler App. No. CA2007-03-083, so res judicata bars him from using habeas corpus to obtain a successive appellate review of the same claims. See Roberts v. Knab, 131 Ohio St.3d 60, 2012-Ohio-56, 960 N.E.2d 457, ¶ 1.

{¶ 2} Moreover, because Harsh either raised or could have raised his claims in three previous state habeas corpus cases, res judicata also bars him…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Keith v. BobbyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Haynes v. VoorhiesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Columbus City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Webber v. KellyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Smith v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gibson v. Sloan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State ex rel. Jackson v. Sloan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Cool v. TurnerOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Starkey v. ShoopOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Washington v. EppingerOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API