Legal Opinion

Cool v. Turner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2013No. 2012-1344PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment dismissing the petition of appellant, Michael E. Cool, for a writ of habeas corpus. He had an adequate remedy by appeal to raise his claim that the trial court erred in denying his motion for jail-time credit. See State ex rel. Rudolph v. Horton, 119 Ohio St.3d 350, 2008-Ohio-4476, 894 N.E.2d 49, ¶ 3. And the fact that Cool has already unsuccessfully invoked alternate remedies in the ordinary course of law by motion and appeal to raise this claim does not entitle him to extraordinary relief in habeas corpus to relitigate the matter. Heddleston v. Mack, 84 Ohio…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heddleston v. MackOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Harsh v. SheetsOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State ex rel. Rudolph v. HortonOhio Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SandsOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State ex rel. Shafer v. Wainwright (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Pruitt v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State ex rel. Gibson v. SloanOhio Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API