McGreevy v. Oregon Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Today we decide whether a party who successfully secures denied insurance coverage must segregate the effort between the coverage and damage issues when seeking an award of attorney fees using the lodestar method of calculation. Also we decide: 1) whether this record supports the trial court’s conclusion that an amount equal to the contingent fee is a reasonable fee; and 2) whether the record supports the cost bill, particularly the denial of experts’ fees.
We reverse and remand for further proceedings because we hold a party must segregate the time spent obtaining coverage from proving…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- PUD DISTRICT NO. 1, KLICKITAT COUNTY v. International Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- Boeing Company v. Sierracin CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Panorama Village Condominium Owners Ass'n Board of Directors v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Panorama Village v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Colorado Structures, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of the WestWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Colorado Structures, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of the WestWashington Supreme Court · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.