Legal Opinion

Pennaco Resources, Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 5, 1992No. 77226Published

1Opinion of the Court

BAILEY, Judge:

Appellant Pennaco Resources Corporation (Pennaco) seeks review of an order of the Corporation Commission sitting en banc (Commission) adopting the findings of the appellate hearing officer and holding that well costs assessed by Appellee Sanguine, Ltd. (Sanguine) were reasonable and necessary. Herein, Pennaco asserts (in essence) no liability for costs incurred in the drilling of an “unauthorized, off pattern, bottom hole location.”

Sanguine drilled the Schlitt Well in Section 2, T5N, R10W, Caddo County, Oklahoma, in accord with Commission pooling orders. Pennaco, as a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tenneco Oil Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Samson Resources Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  3. McDaniel v. MoyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Lear Petroleum Corp. v. Seneca Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API