Legal Opinion
McDaniel v. Moyer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 19, 1983No. 52115, 52135PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
The issues presented by this appeal are: [1] Did the district court err in granting injunctive relief to prevent landowners’ interference with the drilling activities on their forced pooled mineral estate unsev-ered from the surface? [2] Does the district court have subject-matter jurisdiction to relocate a well site designated by a Corporation Commission [Commission] order? and [3] Did landowners’ pleadings or their evidence afford a basis for invoking equitable cognizance to determine their legal claim to the compensated use of the well bore at the drilling site? We answer…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Amarex, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Gulfstream Petroleum Corp. v. LaydenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Cabot Carbon Company v. Phillips Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Crest Resources and Exploration Corp. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Stipe v. TheusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Harry R. Carlile Trust v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Amoco Production Co. v. Corporation CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1986
- Mullins v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Kaneb Production Co. v. GHK Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Ashikian v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Horse Racing Commission ex rel. Blue Ribbon Downs Board of StewardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.