Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BRADEN, Judge.
Although the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has decided five federal income tax cases applying the “all events test,” established by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Anderson, 269 U.S. 422, 431, 46 S.Ct. 131, 70 L.Ed. 347 (1926), none has addressed whether the right to receive supplemental premium income is “fixed” and when that amount of income can be determined with “reasonable accuracy” for purposes of calculating life insurance company taxable income--the core issues presented in this case.
PRELIMINARY…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012