Legal Opinion
Deneen v. City of New York
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 6, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINIÓN OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order entered November 13, 1980 reversed, with $10 costs, motion granted, and complaint dismissed.
As justification for sustaining this direct action by a union member against his employer, the City of New York, to recover the amount of a general salary increase deferred for a period of one year pursuant to a wage deferral agreement executed by plaintiff’s union in 1975, the Small Claims Court found “misconduct” on the part of the union “in entering into an ambiguous wage deferral agreement, by * * * refusing to process plaintiff’s claim when he *524asked the union to do so,…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Albert v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1980
- Lewis v. KlepakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Deneen v. City of New YorkCivil Court of the City of New York · 1980
4Cited by3 opinions
- Symanski v. East Ramapo Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Rizzo v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
- Rizzo v. City of New YorkAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005