Symanski v. East Ramapo Central School District
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rubin, J.
The plaintiff, a principal employed by the defendant East Ramapo Central School District (hereinafter the school district) and a member of the defendant union, applied for a longevity increment to which he claimed he was eligible under paragraph E of article XI of a collective bargaining agreement entered into between the union and the school district. The school district denied the plaintiffs application, informing the plaintiff that he must retire in order to be eligible for the longevity increment, albeit no such prerequisite appeared in paragraph E of article…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Wittleder v. Citizens' Electric Illuminating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Clissuras v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Cannavo v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Mellon v. BenkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Braatz v. MathisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Garvin v. New York State Public Employment Relations BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.