Legal Opinion

Morgasen v. Federated Consultant Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 17, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Di Noto, J.), dated November 27, 1989, as denied its motion to disqualify the plaintiffs’ attorneys.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

An attorney should be disqualified once it is determined that he or she ought to testify at trial (see, S & S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v 777 S. H. Corp., 69 NY2d 437; Code of Professional Responsibility DR 5-101 [B]; DR 5-102 [A]). However,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Reichenbaum v. Reichenbaum & Silberstein, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bullard v. CoulterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Moore & Moore Real Estate v. AloiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Oi Tai Chan v. Society of Shaolin Temple, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API