Legal Opinion
Morris v. Postma
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 20, 1964PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
41 N.J. 354 (1964)
196 A.2d 792
HOWARD MORRIS, EDWARD MORRIS AND ROSE MORRIS, PARTNERS, TRADING AS CARICK REALTY CO., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
NICHOLAS W. POSTMA, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
HOWARD MORRIS, EDWARD MORRIS AND ROSE MORRIS, PARTNERS, TRADING AS CARICK REALTY, CO., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIRLAWN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued December 17, 1963.
Decided January 20, 1964.
Mr.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morris v. PostmaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
3Cited by25 opinions
- Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- KRUVANT BROS. v. Mayor & Council, Tp. of Cedar GroveSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Urban Farms, Inc. v. Franklin LakesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Richmond Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Ross v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.