Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Kritzer

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1930PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

The Chelsea Auction Rooms & Art Galleries, Inc., was a domestic corporation consisting of two stockholders, Abraham Kritzer and his wife, Augusta Kritzer. Louis Kritzer, the father of Abraham, may have been a stockholder, as he was called “ a dummy in the corporation, a third party.” Abraham Kritzer said his father was a dummy for him and his wife. Some time prior to the transactions here in question, Abraham Kritzer and his wife sold fifty per cent of the stock, or 252 shares, to Philip Bernstein, a brother-in-law, who had married Abraham’s sister. Philip and his wife’s relatives did not get…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Jamestown Business College Assn. v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Higgins v. . RidgwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Smith v. . DotterweichNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Title Guarantee Trust Co. v. . Pam.New York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bersani v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Bay Parkway National Bank v. ShalomNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Hamilton v. BoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Happy Dack Trading Co., Ltd. v. Agro-Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  5. Bersani v. GEN. ACC. FIRE CORP.New York Court of Appeals · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API