Legal Opinion
Bay Parkway National Bank v. Shalom
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
The action is on a promissory note dated June 24, 1931, for $5,750, of which defendant is the maker. The defenses are lack of consideration, accommodation for the benefit of plaintiff and an agreement that the note was not to be paid by defendant. This note is a renewal of one for $9,000, dated July 22, 1930.
Prior to the making of the original note dated July 22, 1930, Munsalli & Farbman, a partnership engaged in the sale of lingerie and also the French Lingerie Shop, Inc., a corporation which had taken over the stock of Munsalli & Farbman, were indebted to plaintiff bank. Defendant was a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Higgins v. . RidgwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Reiner v. North American Newspaper AllianceNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Hurd v. . KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Union Bank v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Bernstein v. KritzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. BergoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Chemical Bank v. WassermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Nat'l Prem. Budget Plan Corp. v. Nat'l Fire Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.