W.O. Brisben Companies, Inc. v. Krystkowiak
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAILEY.
In this tort action for intentional interference with a contract, defendant, Eric Kryst-kowiak, appeals from a judgment granting his motion to dismiss, but denying his request for attorney fees and costs. Plaintiff, W.O. Brisben Companies, Inc. (Brisben), cross-appeals the judgment dismissing the action. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
Brisben proposed to build an apartment complex on vacant land located directly across the street from Krystkowiak's house.
Krystkowiak and his neighbors organized the Northeast Colorado Springs Neighborhood Association…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Roe v. Aware Woman Center for Choice, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- King v. DriscollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Trimble v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Krystkowiak v. W.O. Brisben Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Gruhlke v. Sioux Empire Federal Credit Union, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Parr v. TRIPLE L & J CORP.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2004
- Hemmann Management Services v. Mediacell, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Gray v. University of Colorado Hospital AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.