Legal Opinion

Parr v. TRIPLE L & J CORP.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 2004No. 03CA0607, 03CA0930PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCasebolt, J.

In this case involving a real estate lease, defendants, Triple L & J Corporation and Scott T. Schafer, appeal the judgment in favor of plaintiffs, Frank Parr and Dora Bailey. The trial court determined that Triple L & J breached the lease by unreasonably withholding consent to an assignment and that Triple L & J and Schafer were liable for intentional interference with a prospective business advantage. The court awarded punitive, economic, and noneconomic damages and assessed costs and attorney fees. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

Schafer became the president and the sole…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  2. Amoco Oil Co. v. ErvinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. BRW, Inc. v. Dufficy & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  4. Presnell Construction Managers, Inc. v. EH Construction, LLCKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  5. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gorsuch, Ltd., B.C. v. Wells Fargo National Bank Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. Hamon Contractors, Inc. v. Carter & Burgess, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Fisher v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Rhino Fund, LLLP v. HutchinsColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Walsh v. Cluba and Good Stuff, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API