Legal Opinion
Spodek v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 10, 2001No. Nos. 01-82C, 98-594CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se, lease buildings to the United States Postal Service (USPS) for use as post offices. The property which is the subject of the above captioned complaint is known as the Schuylkill Station Post Office and is located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The USPS entered into written lease agreements with a predecessor lessor from August 1, 1971 until July 31, 1996. Pursuant to the leases, the USPS paid rent in the amount of $1,516.67 per month (or $18,200.04 per annum). The property was sold to Nationwide Postal Management…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Spodek v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002