Legal Opinion
Department of Ecology v. City of Kirkland
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 3, 1974No. 42821PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
— On November 1, 1971, the City of Kirkland issued a substantial development permit authorizing construction of an all-weather moorage facility on Lake Washington by the Bittman, Sanders, Hasson Corporation. Since this proposed moorage facility would allegedly result in a substantial increase in the lake’s surface area being covered by structures as compared to the existing situation, the Department of Ecology and the Attorney General sought review of this matter by the Shorelines Hearings Board pursuant to RCW 90.58.180. RCW 90.58.180 directs that review proceedings by the board are subject…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Federal Power Commission v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ancheta v. DalyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Isbrandtsen Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Norway Hill Preservation & Protection Ass'n v. King County CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Swift v. Island CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Hayes v. YountWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Conoco, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- People of the State of California Ex Rel. Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.