Legal Opinion

Lon, Alias Ike Crayton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 22, 1903No. 2471PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The indictment is set out in the opinion. Ho further statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

-Appellant was convicted of forgery, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of five years.

The charging part of the indictment is as follows:

“Lon Crayton, alias Ike Crayton, * * * on or about the 28th day of March, 1902, * * * then and there, without lawful authority, and with intent to injure and defraud, did willfully and fraudulently make a false and forged instrument in writing purporting to be the act of Brack Hall, which said false and forged instrument in writing •is substantially to the tenor as follows:
“ ‘The State of Texas, County of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895
  2. Stephens v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Fite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Gibbons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ritter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Crayton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Darwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API