Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 7, 2013No. SC10-916PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, we consider whether certain comments made by a prosecutor were impermissible. Gary Fontaine Bell seeks review of Bell v. State, 33 So.3d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), in which the First District Court of Appeal affirmed Bell’s convictions and sentences for lewd and lascivious molestation on a victim under twelve years of age by an offender eighteen years of age or older and for failure to appear. The First District addressed, inter alia, the following statement made by the prosecutor during closing argument in regard to the victim’s age, an element of the molestation charge: “[S]o…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Joiner v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Harrell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  5. Card v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Leo Louis Kaczmar, III v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2017
  2. Talley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. Augustine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Jon Paul Hogle v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  5. Sampson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API