Roberson v. Christoferson
District Court, D. North Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BENSON, Chief Judge.
Defendants have collectively moved for a summary judgment under Rule 56, and, alternatively, for dismissal under Rule 37, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In moving for a summary judgment, Defendants argue that on the record to date, North Dakota’s Statute of Limitations, NDCC § 28-01-18, applicable to malpractice actions, bars this action. Defendants base their dismissal motion on Plaintiffs’ failure or refusal to comply with an order of the Court dated July 17, 1974, directing Plaintiffs to file answers to Defendants’ interrogatories. It is not…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Trogun v. FruchtmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Perin v. HayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- John W. Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., a New York Corporation and Volkswagenwerk, A. G., a Foreign Corporation, Wolfsburg, Western GermanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Telectron, Inc. v. Overhead Door Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1987
- Harold Affanato v. Merrill Brothers and Cianbro Corporation, Appeal of Cianbro CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Winkjer v. HerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.