Legal Opinion

Joya v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 2012No. 12-CO-252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Associate Judge:

This matter is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of a motion by appellant Pedro Joya to dismiss a charge of contributing to the delinquency of a minor (CDM), on which appellant is awaiting trial. Appellant contends that the government is barred by collateral estoppel, as embodied in the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, from prosecuting him on that charge, which arose in connection with robbery, assault, and *312weapons offenses of which appellant was acquitted in an earlier trial. The government contends…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Jeffers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Michael N. Currier v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2015
  2. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API