Michael N. Currier v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
McCULLOUGH, Judge.
Michael N. Currier challenges his conviction for possession of a firearm after having been convicted of a violent felony. He argues that the Double Jeopardy Clause, and particularly its collateral estoppel protections, bar his conviction. He also contends that the trial court abused its discretion in concluding that evidence of appellant’s involvement in a breaking and entering and a grand larceny were relevant and not prejudicial to his charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm. We disagree and affirm.
BACKGROUND
Paul Garrison, II, returned home from work on March 7,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Currier v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Roland Baldwin v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
- James Willis Campbell, Sr. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
- Tina Lasha Hall, a/k/a Tina Lasha Waller v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
- Andarion Lorenzo McInnis v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.