Legal Opinion
Camp Richardson Resort, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 9, 2015No. 2:15-cv-01101-TLN-ACPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company’s (“Defendant” or “Philadelphia”) Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff Camp Richardson Resort (“Plaintiff’ or “CRR”) opposes Defendant’s motion. (ECF No. 12.) The Court has carefully considered the arguments raised by both parties. For the.reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED/
Background
On May 5, 20Í5, Plaintiff filed its complaint…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Auburn Woods I Homeowners Assn. v. State Farm General Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Auburn Woods I Homeowners Assn. v. State Farm Ins. Co. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- Morgan v. Community Against ViolenceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2024
- Thompson v. Crestbrook Insurance CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022