McIntosh v. Personnel Commission
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
We are asked herein to review, pursuant to the standard of RSA 541:13, the ruling of the personnel commission that the plaintiff’s removal from his position as director of the office of manpower affairs was a valid layoff for reasons of economy and efficiency and not, as alleged, a retaliatory discharge inspired by political motives. For the reasons which follow herein, we affirm the commission’s finding.
On January 2, 1976, the plaintiff received a letter from James J. Barry, commissioner of the office of manpower affairs [hereinafter OMA], informing him that effective January 19, 1976, Mr.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gaul v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Foote v. State Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Colburn v. Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Desmarais v. State of New Hampshire Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Petition of Gorham School BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Arnold v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.