Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. Personnel Commission

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 29, 1977No. 7596PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

We are asked herein to review, pursuant to the standard of RSA 541:13, the ruling of the personnel commission that the plaintiff’s removal from his position as director of the office of manpower affairs was a valid layoff for reasons of economy and efficiency and not, as alleged, a retaliatory discharge inspired by political motives. For the reasons which follow herein, we affirm the commission’s finding.

On January 2, 1976, the plaintiff received a letter from James J. Barry, commissioner of the office of manpower affairs [hereinafter OMA], informing him that effective January 19, 1976, Mr.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Gaul v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Foote v. State Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Colburn v. Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  3. Desmarais v. State of New Hampshire Personnel CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Petition of Gorham School BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  5. Arnold v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API