Legal Opinion

United States v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 11, 1981No. Civ. A. 791-69PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEANOR, District Judge.

This is an action instituted on July 9,1969 by the United States under section 4 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 4, for injunctive and other appropriate relief to remedy and prevent alleged violations of section 1 of the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1.

The defendant, Ciba-Geigy, is a New York corporation with its principal offices in Ardsley, N.Y., and the principal offices of its pharmaceutical subsidiary in Summit, N.J.. Defendant was formed in 1970 through the acquisition of CIBA, a Delaware corporation, by Geigy Pharmaceuticals, a New York corporation, following which the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nobelpharma AB v. Implant Innovations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Nobelpharma Ab v. Implant Innovations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  3. In Re John P. ChuppCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Merck & Co., Inc. v. Biocraft Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API