Ransford v. Ainsworth
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
This appeal is by the defendant Minerva I. Ainsworth from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against both defendants for the sum of .two thousand dollars based upon the verdict of a jury in an action to recover damages for injuries received by the plaintiff in a collision between the automobile of the defendant and appellant M. I. Ainsworth while being driven and operated by her husband and codefendant A. 6. Ainsworth on and along the streets of the city of Napa. The sole question presented upon this appeal is as to whether the evidence was sufficient to justify the verdict and judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Maupin v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Randolph v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- McWhirter v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Grantham v. OrdwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Spence v. FisherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Engstrom v. Auburn Automobile Sales Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Perry v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Squires v. RiffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Market Street Railway Co. v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.